Fix the broken F.C.C.
47 USC 153 (59)
Wire Communications
disguised as "online"
were always use of a
Title II common carrier
for telecommunications.
Copyright=Copy[rite]
COMPLAINT FILED
| Reno v ACLU 521 U.S. 844 VOID since 2000 or before !!! |
| Neeley v NameMedia Inc et al, (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) Neeley v NameMedia Inc et al, (5:12-cv-05074) Neeley Jr v FCC, et al, (5:12-cv-05208) (13-1506)(13-6502) Neeley v FCC, et al, (5:13-mc-00066) Neeley v Federal Communications Commissioners, et al,(5:13-cv-5293) Neeley Jr v 5 Federal Communications Commissioners, et al,(5:14-cv-5135)(14-3447) |
03-09-2015 Eighth
Circuit Court panel called DISHONORABLE.
Curtis J Neeley Jr. will not again sue the FCC but will assist
law firms, churches, & foundations. S I L E N T L Y
(59)Wire communication
The term “wire communication” or “communication by wire” means the transmission of writing, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds of all kinds by aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the points of origin and reception of such transmission, including all instrumentalities, facilities, apparatus, and services (among other things, the receipt, forwarding, and delivery of communications) incidental to such transmission.